Estate of Furgason v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Social Services
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtDykman, P. J.
The estates of Mildred and John Furgason appeal from a judgment affirming a decision of the Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS). DHSS concluded that the Furgasons were ineligible for medical assistance (MA) benefits because the farm that they placed in a revocable trust did not qualify as an exempt asset. We conclude that the farm held in trust was an exempt homestead, and therefore DHSS erred in denying the Furgasons MA benefits. Accordingly, we reverse.
BACKGROUND
John Furgason applied for and began to receive MA as a nursing home resident on March 12,1990. On April…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Sweet v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- State v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Muskego v. GodecWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Tannler v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kaskin v. John Lynch Chevrolet-Pontiac Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009