Tannler v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Social Services
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonald W. Steinmetz, J.
¶1. The issue in this case is whether an institutionalized person's fail*181ure to assert a claim against his or her deceased "community spouse's"1 estate constitutes a divestment under the Medical Assistance (MA) program. We conclude that the failure to make a spousal election is an "action" for purposes of determining MA eligibility under Wis. Stat. § 49.4532 as defined by 42 USC § 1396p(e)(l).3 We therefore hold that the failure of an institutionalized spouse to assert a claim against the estate of his or her deceased spouse constitutes a divestment for purposes of determining MA eligibility.4
*182¶…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Kelley Co., Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Jicha v. State Department of Industry, Labor & Human Rights DivisionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Drivers, Salesmen, Warehousemen, Milk Processors, Cannery, Dairy Employees & Helpers Local No. 695 v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WilliquetteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- County of Dane v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Miller v. State Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Cholvin v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- Buettner v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- County of Milwaukee v. Superior of Wisconsin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.