Legal Opinion

Tannler v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Social Services

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1997No. 96-0118PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonald W. Steinmetz, J.

¶1. The issue in this case is whether an institutionalized person's fail*181ure to assert a claim against his or her deceased "community spouse's"1 estate constitutes a divestment under the Medical Assistance (MA) program. We conclude that the failure to make a spousal election is an "action" for purposes of determining MA eligibility under Wis. Stat. § 49.4532 as defined by 42 USC § 1396p(e)(l).3 We therefore hold that the failure of an institutionalized spouse to assert a claim against the estate of his or her deceased spouse constitutes a divestment for purposes of determining MA eligibility.4

*182¶…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Kelley Co., Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Jicha v. State Department of Industry, Labor & Human Rights DivisionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Drivers, Salesmen, Warehousemen, Milk Processors, Cannery, Dairy Employees & Helpers Local No. 695 v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. WilliquetteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. County of Dane v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Miller v. State Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Cholvin v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  4. Buettner v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  5. County of Milwaukee v. Superior of Wisconsin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API