Kaskin v. John Lynch Chevrolet-Pontiac Sales, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.
¶ 1. This case concerns that part of our consumer protection law dealing with unauthorized motor vehicle repair. Wisconsin Admin. Code §ATCF 132.09(1), (4)(e) (Oct. 2004) 1 states, in pertinent part, that "[n]o shop may.. . [d]emand or receive payment for unauthorized repairs, or for repairs that have not been performed." We hold that a major purpose of this provision is to prevent either unexpected repairs, unexpected expense or both. Therefore, if the work done here was unauthorized, then the harm to the consumer, Randy W. Kaskin, was that he was deprived of his prescribed right to be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Baierl v. McTaggartWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Fond Du Lac County v. Town of RosendaleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- Osteen v. MorrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Moonlight v. BoyceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Koble Investments v. Elicia MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2026
- Al Poller and Deb Poller v. Okoboji Classic Cars, LLCSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
- Al Poller and Deb Poller v. Okoboji Classic Cars, LLCCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2020
- Al Poller and Deb Poller v. Okoboji Classic Cars, LLCSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
- Cortez Gomez, Michelle v. Kohl's CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.