Legal Opinion

McAllister v. Union Indemnity Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1935No. L. A. 14854PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The question here is whether the relief afforded plaintiff was within the scope of the issues framed by the pleadings in the cause.

The amended complaint alleged breach of an oral contract for employment of plaintiff by defendant for one year from August 16, 1928, at an annual salary of $11,000, through the wrongful discharge of plaintiff on September 15, 1928. The answer, among other things, alleged as a third separate defense that said contract, if any, was mutually canceled on said September 15th. The court found this to be the fact and that upon said mutual termination of the employment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Mock v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Peck v. NoeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Miller v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. County of Sacramento v. LacknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Raphael v. RaphaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Estate of PieperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Estrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API