Legal Opinion
Motzner v. Bogan
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided May 10, 1913No. 17,960PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Russell district court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Benson, J.:
This is an action to restrain the collection of taxes on certain contracts respecting the conveyance of land. These contracts are designated as *497the Spaedt, Weimer, and Bender contracts, respectively. The Spaedt contract, dated April 18, 1908, recited that:
“This Agreement, made this 18th day of April, A. D. 1908, between John Motzner, a bachelor, party of the first part, and Jacob Spaedt, party of the second part, Witnesseth: That the said party of the first part hereby covenants and agrees that if the party of the second part shall first…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chambers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Williams v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- McGregor v. IrelandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Golden v. ClaudelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Bohart v. Republic Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Golden v. MunsingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Harris v. FravelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Johnson v. WoodburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- McNinch v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924