Legal Opinion

Flanders v. Merrill

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 19, 1874PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from, Clayton Pistriet Court. Action to foreclose title bond. Judgment for plaintiff on demurrer. Defendant appeals. The. facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Oh. J.

— The original petition alleged that on the 7th day of February 1867, plaintiff Sold to William B. Grant and Samuel Merrill certain real estate described in a bond annexed, and which was then executed and delivered. It alleges the payment of the mortgage mentioned in the bond, and claims judgment for the two last payments which it alleges to be due. The bond is as follows: ■ •

“Whereas, Samuel Merrill and Wm. B. Grant, of the County of Clayton and State of Iowa, in consideration of eight thousand five hundred dollars, to be paid as follows, to-wit:
“ The sum of five hundred…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barrett v. DeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  2. Newbury v. RutterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Westervelt v. HuiskampSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Cross v. SnakenbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Motzner v. BoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Green Ridge Fuel Co. v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Ballard-Hassett Co. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API