Legal Opinion

Baker v. Baker

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1914No. L.A. No. 3351PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff sued for a divorce from her' husband upon the grounds of willful desertion and willful neglect, alleging as causes for divorce upon the latter ground failure to provide plaintiff with the common necessaries of life, defendant having the ability so to do, and omission to do so by reason of idleness, profligacy, and dissipation. The cause was duly tried upon issues joined, and the court denied the divorce. The ‘findings in substance were that plaintiff possessed property in her own right, having a value of more than forty thousand dollars; that the income therefrom was more than…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  2. Pigeon v. W. P. Fuller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Gray v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Zihn v. ZihnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Peretti v. PerettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McAuliffe v. McAuliffeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Black Rock Placer Mining District v. Summit Water & Irrigation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Portis v. PortisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API