Legal Opinion
Black Rock Placer Mining District v. Summit Water & Irrigation Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 5, 1943No. Civ. No. 6728PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment rendered pursuant to an order sustaining a demurrer to its complaint without leave to amend the pleading. The suit was brought in eminent domain by an organized placer mining district, under section 73.5 of the Placer Mining District Act (Stats. 1933, eh. 899, p. 2321, Deering’s Supp. Laws of Cal. 1933, p. 1889, Act 4938a; now § 2473(a), Public Resources Code), to condemn land in Nevada County for the use of the district.
The appellant contends that a placer mining district which is organized pursuant to law has the right to invoke proceedings in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Logan v. StogsdaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- IBM Personal Pension Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. DusekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Martha P.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Estate of StraisingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.