Legal Opinion
Sengchanthong v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 13, 2007No. SC 17606PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, Indy Sengchanthong, was operating a motor vehicle within the meaning of General Statutes § 14-227I). After a hearing, the defendant, the commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner), suspended the plaintiffs motor vehicle operator’s license for ninety days pursuant to that statute. The plaintiff appealed to the trial court, which sustained his appeal. Thereafter, the commissioner appealed from the judgment of the trial court to the Appellate Court. Sengchanthong v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 92 Conn. App. 365, 885 A.2d 218…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Jagger v. Mohawk Mountain Ski Area, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. HaightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Town of Wallingford v. Department of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- O'CONNOR v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Jim's Auto Body v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Okeke v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Stash v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Finley v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.