Grant County State Bank Ex Rel. Veigel v. Schultz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 228 N.W. 150. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion in the alternative for judgment non obstante or a new trial.
The suit is upon a promissory note for $6,000, made August 21, 1923, by defendants, payable November 21, 1923, to Grant County State Bank of Herman, now, and since November 10, 1926, in the hands of plaintiff, the commissioner of banks, for liquidation. The defense was that there was no consideration for the note. The verdict so found, and in our opinion that finding is amply sustained.
Plaintiff's proof showed that the note, of which the one in suit is a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vallely v. DevaneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- German-American Finance Corp. v. Merchants & Manufacturers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Estate of TaskerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Stammers v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- Camerer v. California Savings & Commercial BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Siggelkow v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- EEP Workers' Compensation Fund v. Fun & Sun, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Citizens State Bank v. VohsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Liederbach v. PickettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.