Legal Opinion
Goolsby v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 23, 1990No. 90-118CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s renewed motion to dismiss pursuant to RUSCC 12(b)(1) for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter. To be decided is the issue whether defendant’s failure to obtain a release of a debt owed by plaintiff to a third party constitutes a breach of an implied-in-fact contract over which the court has jurisdiction. The court denied in part and granted in part defendant’s original motion to dismiss pursuant to RUSCC 12(b)(4) for failure to state a claim for relief. Goolsby v. United States, 21 Cl.Ct. 88 (1990). Argument on the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Maniere v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Edwards v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Educators Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Laudes Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Rohmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.