Legal Opinion

Kemmer v. Keiski

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 20, 2003No. 27782-4-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

By means of a notice of appeal filed September 6, 2001, Louise Kemmer purports to appeal two judgments. The first, entered on May 31, 2000, granted a 12-foot easement across her property. The second, entered on August 10, 2001, expanded the 12-foot easement to 30 feet at some points. Holding that the first judgment was not timely appealed, we decline to review or disturb it. Holding that the second judgment was precluded by the first, we vacate and reverse it.

Many years ago, Fritz Keiski owned property that straddled Highway 101 in Pacific County. On a date the record does not show, he…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pederson v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. Pederson v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Anderson & Middleton Lumber Co. v. Quinault Indian NationWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In re the Marriage of BurrillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Fox v. Sunmaster Products, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. Karlberg v. OttenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Kemmer v. KeiskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Bogomolov v. Lake Villas Condominium Ass'n of Apartment OwnersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Holiday v. City of Moses LakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API