Legal Opinion

Fox v. Sunmaster Products, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1990No. 57325-5PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a products liability action in which each of several defendants prevailed, at different times, in separate motions for summary judgment. At issue is whether the plaintiffs, Terry and Billie May Fox, were entitled to wait to appeal until their claims against all defendants were resolved. We answer this question "yes" and remand to the Court of Appeals with directions to reinstate the plaintiffs' appeal as to Ladder Industries, Inc.

Facts

Terry and Billie May Fox filed suit against Sunmaster Products, Inc., and Stepmaster Ladder, Inc., in July of 1986. Terry Fox had been seriously injured…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Doerflinger v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Schiffman v. Hanson Excavating Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Hiner v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hiner v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hiner v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API