Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Burrill

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 9, 2002No. Nos. 49205-5-I; 49817-7-IPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

— In a consolidated appeal, Cynthia Burrill (Cindy) challenges a final parenting plan awarding primary residential care of the parties’ children to the father, the trial court’s attorney fee award, and Don R. Burrill’s (Don) *866postdissolution judgment for damages. Because substantial evidence supported the trial court’s findings, which in turn supported its conclusions of law, we affirm.

I

At the time Cindy Burrill and Don Burrill dissolved their marriage, both had been equally providing for the care their daughters, E.B., age 9, and A.B., age 4. Because of his flexible work schedule, Don had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Boeing Co. v. RooneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Panorama Village Homeowners v. Golden RuleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. In re the Marriage of LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of KatareWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re the Marriage of ChandolaWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Deep Water Brewing v. Fairway Resources Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Deep Water Brewing, LLC v. Fairway Resources Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Kemmer v. KeiskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API