Karlberg v. Otten
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
¶1 This appeal arises from two successive judgments quieting title. In his first action, plaintiff Gary Karlberg sought and obtained a judgment placing the new boundary line between his property and defendant Steven Otten’s about halfway between the surveyed line and an old fence. In his second action, he sought and obtained a judgment establishing the fence as the boundary line. Concluding that res judicata barred the splitting of the claim, we reverse the second judgment and leave the boundary line as established by the first judgment.
FACTS
¶2 According to unchallenged findings of fact…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Matter of Estate of LintWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Murphy v. LintWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Pederson v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Ensley v. PitcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Jackson v. Quality Loan Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Ainsworth v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- James And Holly Kave, V Mcintosh Ridge Primary Road AssocCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Public Utility District No. 2 v. Comcast of Washington IV, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Berschauer Phillips Construction Co. v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.