State v. Lujan
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} Defendant appeals his convictions for four counts of trafficking in a controlled substance. We consider the effect of Defendant’s failure to utilize procedures under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD) on the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. We hold that, under the circumstances of this case, Defendant’s delay in exercising his rights under the IAD does not weigh against him for purposes of his speedy trial claim. We further hold that the State violated Defendant’s right to a speedy trial, and we therefore reverse his convictions and remand for the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Zurla v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Salandre v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. PlouseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. GrissomNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. MaddoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. StockNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. TalamanteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. PalacioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.