Legal Opinion

State v. Grissom

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 1987No. 9552, 9562 and 9573PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, Chief Judge.

The state appeals from three separate orders of the trial court dismissing criminal charges against defendants W.W. Taylor and Joe T. Boyd for alleged fraudulent practices, conspiracy and racketeering, and dismissing charges against defendant Hollis Grissom for alleged fraudulent practices. Because the appeals involve common issues, they have been consolidated for hearing before this court.

Two issues are presented on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in dismissing criminal charges arising out of the alleged violation of an emergency regulation promulgated…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Zurla v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Salandre v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. LaneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. Vigil-GironNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API