Legal Opinion
State v. Talamante
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 22, 2003No. 23,081PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, J.
{1} This is a speedy trial case under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in which we are required to determine the applicable length of delay where there are successive indictments charging identical offenses. The first indictment was filed on March 25, 1999, and dismissed without prejudice on May 5, 2000. That same day, a second indictment was returned, charging the same offenses. On October 23, 2001, Defendant conditionally pleaded no contest to reduced charges, reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Zurla v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Salandre v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. Vigil-GironNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. StockNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. SerrosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. PalacioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.