Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Land of California

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 30, 1961No. Civ. No. 8116PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALBERT, District Judge.

Plaintiff has instituted this action to condemn certain property, belonging to defendant, City of Red Bluff, hereafter in this memorandum referred to as defendant. The property in question is part of a city public.parking lot, admittedly the property of defendant, and admittedly being used for a public purpose at the time of the taking. At a pre-trial hearing, the parties agreed to brief and submit to this Court for decision the pertinent legal issue which is here involved. All agree that this issue must be settled before this case can proceed expeditiously. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Town of Clarksville, Va. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  3. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
  4. United States v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
  5. State of California v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. UNITED STATES v. CERTAIN PROPERTY of BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN, CITY, COUNTY & NEW YORKCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. City of Wichita v. Unified School District No. 259Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  3. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. City of WinchesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
  4. Masheter v. Cleveland Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. United States v. 50 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Dallas CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API