Legal Opinion
Washington v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 1, 1954No. 13312PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.
In this condemnation action there is involved the taking by the United States of America, hereafter called the United States, of a secondary road belonging to the State of Washington, hereafter called the State. After trial before a jury, and the return of a verdict in favor of the State for $581,721.91, the trial court determined that “no substantial evidence was adduced in the trial of said cause establishing or tending to establish the necessity for a replacement” of the state highway taken. The trial court set aside the verdict, and directed judgment be…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Pace v. CapobiancoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Waterman v. BattonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Janich Bros., Inc. v. The American Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Quentin Reynolds v. Westbrook Pegler, the Hearst Corporation and Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.