Legal Opinion

State of California v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 1, 1948No. 11797PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.

The monetary value, for condemnation purposes, of tide and submerged lands mapped out as streets eighty years ago by the California Board of Tide Land Commissioners, constitutes the central question in these appeals.

Three judgments, involving four parcels of land covered by the waters of San Francisco Bay, awarded the appellant $1 for its interest in each parcel. The actions were consolidated for trial and have been consolidated for purposes of appeal.

The appellant urges that the judgments of the lower court awarding nominal damages in its favor are erroneous, and asks…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Mall, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Scureman v. JudgeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
  4. State of California v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. ZACK'S, INC. v. City of SausalitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API