Legal Opinion

Masheter v. Cleveland Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1969No. 68-13PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

The errors assigned by the Director of Highways relate to:

1. The standard of substitution or replacement value as the measure of compensation;

2. Extension of privilege to appraiser employed by adverse party;

*293. The exclusion of conflicting prior statements of a witness on the ground that they occurred during a period of negotiation;

4. The admission of opinion evidence of replacement costs by the board of education expert in the absence of any specific plans for a replacement school;

5. The use of a single damage item verdict form, whereas Section 5519.03, Revised Code, requires separate findings…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town of Clarksville, Va. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  2. State v. Waco Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. City of Wichita v. Unified School District No. 259Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. County of Cook v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  5. United States v. Certain Land of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Bd. of Ed. of ElizabethNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  2. Masheter v. Mariemont, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Hyden v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API