Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Stanley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 4, 1938No. 28241PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Canadian county denjdng a writ of mandamus.
It is shown from the record that the plaintiff in error, E. F. Thompson, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, in the general election of 1936 was re-elected for the office of county judge of Canadian county for the ensuing term. The plaintiff, the incumbent county judge, failed to qualify as required by statute within ten days from the date the new term for which he was elected was to begin.
' It is shown that the plaintiff continued to serve as county judge and on the 29th day of January,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roberts v. LedgerwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Wade v. Board of Com'rs of Harmon CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- In Re BucherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Caddo County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. District Court of Mayes CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- May v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Haas v. HollomanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Anderson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.