Caddo County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review. The defendant in error, as protestant, protested certain appropriations and levies made by tbe excise board of Caddo county, Okla., for tbe fiscal year ending June 30, 1931. Tbe only item for consideration bere is a levy of 4 mills for general fund purposes. The protestant contends that that levy is excessive and void in the amount of .11 mill. That contention was sustained by the Court of Tax Review and the protestee appealed to this court.
The appropriations made by the excise board contained an item of $4,500 for the salaries of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Roberts v. LedgerwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Hudgins v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
3Cited by15 opinions
- May v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Haas v. HollomanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Anderson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Lowden v. Oklahoma County, Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.