Legal Opinion

In the Interest of S.A.P.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 22, 2005No. 10-02-00345-CVPublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

BILL VANCE, Justice.

I. Introduction

This case, on remand from the Texas Supreme Court, is an appeal from the termination of the parent-child relationships of Rebecca Williams Peterson (Rebecca) and Jay Scott Peterson (Scott) with their child, S.A.P. Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 161.001 (Vernon 2002). Rebecca’s and Scott’s parent-child relationships with S.A.P. were terminated in November 2002. They each brought several issues on appeal, complaining about (1) the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence, (2) the testimony of Dr. James Shinder, and (3) the estoppel effect of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. In the Interest of E.C.R., ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In the Interest of N.R.T., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
  3. in the Interest of D.S., N.S., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
  4. Brewer v. Simental, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  5. in the Interest of A.C.B., O.B.B., O.C.B. and O.D.B., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API