Legal Opinion

Hoskins v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 30, 2004No. 03-2005CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEWITT, Judge.

In this military pay case, the court has before it Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Def.’s MTD or defendant’s motion), Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Pl.’s MSJ or plaintiffs motion) and Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, Opposition to Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, and Cross-Motion for Judgment upon the Administrative Record (Def.’s MSJ or defendant’s cross-motion).1 Defendant asserts *211two grounds for dismissal of plaintiffs claims under the Rules of the United States…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Tippett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Brooks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Keith L. Keller v. the United States 0United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API