Legal Opinion
Keith L. Keller v. the United States 0
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 6, 2013No. 03-2752CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bush, Senior Judge.
OPINION
This military pay case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss, under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), and on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record, under RCFC 52.1(c). These motions have been fully briefed; oral argument was neither requested by the parties nor required by the court. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted, defendant’s motion for judgment on the administrative record is granted, and plaintiffs motion for judgment on the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hatmaker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Gay v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- O'Brien v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Keller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Engle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.