Legal Opinion

Brooks v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 18, 2005No. 03-2470CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WOLSKI, Judge.

Plaintiff Anthony J. Brooks seeks back pay and appointment to the office of Chief Pharmacist Officer of the United States Public Health Service. Defendant United States moves to dismiss Capt. Brooks’s complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), arguing that the official whose approval was required never appointed Capt. ■ Brooks, and that the selection decision was discretionary and non-justiciable. Plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment under RCFC 56(a). For the reasons that follow, the government’s…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  4. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Verbeck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Six v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Brooks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Anders Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  5. Casiano v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API