Legal Opinion

Woodson v. Torgerson

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 1930No. Docket No. 436PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAINES, J., pro tem.

This action was brought by respondent Clarence Woodson as plaintiff in the statutory form to quiet title to lots 5 and 6 in block 3 of West Teralta, in the county of San Diego, of which in his complaint he claims to be the owner and to be in possession. One B. M. Torgerson, appellants F. J. MacKenzie and J. C. Dyer, copartners under the firm name of MacKenzie and Dyer, and various others, were made parties defendant, the complaint alleging that they each claimed some right, title or interest in and to said property adverse to the plaintiff. Torgerson disclaimed. Certain of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hibberd v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Touchard v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Black v. SharkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McStay v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Andre v. AllynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API