Legal Opinion

State v. Locklear

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 31, 1979No. 7818SC903PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The appellant first assigns error to the trial court’s conclusion that the surety showed extraordinary cause for remission of the judgment. G.S. 15A-544(h) provides that “[f]or extraordinary cause shown, the court which has entered judgment upon a forfeiture of a bond may, after execution, remit the judgment in whole or in part and order the clerk to refund such amounts as the court considers appropriate.” The trial court concluded upon uncontroverted evidence that “the efforts made by Mr. John Lee amount to extraordinary cause shown under the provisions of Chapter 15A, Section…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shore v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Brice v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Wilcox v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Carpenter v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. FestoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. State v. VikreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. CoronelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. Gonzalez-FernandezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. FonvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API