Legal Opinion

State v. Coronel

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 2001No. COA00-503, COA00-504PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Connecticut Indemnity Company (“Connecticut”) and Black Jack Bail Bonds (“Black Jack”) (collectively “sureties”) appeal the Superior Court’s orders denying their motions to remit judgment of bond forfeiture. The Richmond County Board of Education (“the Board”) are judgment creditors and appellees in the present action by virtue of its opportunity to be heard pursuant to section 15A-544 of our General Statutes. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-544 (1999) (repealed Jan. 1, 2001). Upon review of the materials submitted on appeal and arguments of counsel, we affirm the orders of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. . PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. VikreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. ShredehCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Durling v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Biemann & Rowell Co. v. Donohoe CompaniesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. Gonzalez-FernandezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State ex rel. Moore County Board of Education v. PelletierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API