Legal Opinion

State v. Vikre

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1987No. 872SC35PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

The judgments of forfeiture entered by Judge Small on 10 April 1986 were not remitted within the time period prescribed by G.S. 15A-544(e) and executions were issued as required by G.S. 15A-544(f). Therefore, the statute applicable to the sureties’ petition for remission of the judgments is G.S. 15A-544(h). State v. Rakina and State v. Zofira, 49 N.C. App. 537, 272 S.E. 2d 3 (1980), disc. rev. denied, 302 N.C. 221, 277 S.E. 2d 70 (1981). G.S. 15A-544(h), in pertinent part, provides:

For extraordinary cause shown, the court which has entered judgment upon a forfeiture of a bond…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Lafayette Transportation Service, Inc. v. County of RobesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. . PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Curtis Myers v. Amisub (SFH), Inc., d/b/a St. Francis HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. CoronelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. Gonzalez-FernandezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API