Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 10, 1971No. 95PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

In pertinent part of G.S. 136-111 provides: “Any person whose land or compensable interest therein has been taken by an intentional or unintentional act or omission of the Highway Commission and no complaint and declaration of taking has been filed by said Highway Commission may, within twenty-four (24) months of the date of said taking, file a complaint in the superior court . . . for the purpose of determining all matters raised by the pleadings and the determination of just compensation.” The portion omitted from the preceding quotation relates to procedural requirements.

Comm…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ramsey Ex Rel. Ramsey v. North Carolina Veterans CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Bland v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Sheets v. . WalshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Johnson v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. ElamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Powe v. OdellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Motor Inn Management, Inc. v. Irvin-Fuller Development Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Smith v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. BusseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API