Legal Opinion

Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Kneeland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2001No. Docket 114900PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, C.J.

We granted leave to determine whether a contractual provision that assigned “all responsibility for damages” to defendant while she rented a vehicle contravenes our no-fault act, MCL 500.3101 et seq., and thereby voids the parties’ con*493tract. We hold that the no-fault act does not prevent contracting parties from voluntarily allocating liability for collision damage to a rented vehicle. We thus affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

1. underlying facts and procedural history

While repairing defendant’s vehicle, plaintiff Betten Toyota loaned her a vehicle. Defendant and a Betten employee…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Henderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Innovation Ventures v. Liquid ManufacturingMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Pirgu v. United Services Automobile AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Meyer & Anna Prentis Family Foundation, Inc. v. Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API