Pirgu v. United Services Automobile Association
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtViviano, J.
The issue in this case is whether the framework for calculating a reasonable attorney fee set forth in Smith v Khouri 1 applies to attorney fee determinations under MCL 500.3148(1) of the no-fault insurance act. 2 The Court of Appeals’ majority affirmed the trial court’s calculation of the attorney fee award, concluding that the Smith framework does not apply to attorney fee determinations under § 3148(1). We disagree with this conclusion and instead hold that the Smith framework—as described in Justice CORRIGAN’s concurring opinion and as modified herein—applies to attorney fee…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Smith v. KhouriMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- People of Michigan v. Stanley G DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
- Haliw v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Driver v. NainiMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Sheryl Hubbell v. FedEx SmartPostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Hodge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
- Theodore Cadwell v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- 165761_52_01.PdfMichigan Supreme Court · 2024
- Adler Stilman Pllc v. Oakwood Healthcare IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.