Legal Opinion

Pirgu v. United Services Automobile Association

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2016No. Docket 150834PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtViviano, J.

The issue in this case is whether the framework for calculating a reasonable attorney fee set forth in Smith v Khouri 1 applies to attorney fee determinations under MCL 500.3148(1) of the no-fault insurance act. 2 The Court of Appeals’ majority affirmed the trial court’s calculation of the attorney fee award, concluding that the Smith framework does not apply to attorney fee determinations under § 3148(1). We disagree with this conclusion and instead hold that the Smith framework—as described in Justice CORRIGAN’s concurring opinion and as modified herein—applies to attorney fee…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Smith v. KhouriMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People of Michigan v. Stanley G DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Haliw v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Driver v. NainiMichigan Supreme Court · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Sheryl Hubbell v. FedEx SmartPostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Hodge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Theodore Cadwell v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. 165761_52_01.PdfMichigan Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Adler Stilman Pllc v. Oakwood Healthcare IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API