Legal Opinion

Keenan v. Huntington Acceptance Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1993No. 62879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harper, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Donald Keenan, filed a complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County on May 18, 1990, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for. alleged violations of the Federal Truth in Lending Act and Pennsylvania and Ohio consumer laws with regard to the purchase and financing of a motor vehicle. Appellant now appeals from the granting of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Huntington Acceptance Company (“Huntington”), on his complaint and on the counterclaim of Huntington.

I

On May 31, 1989, appellant entered into a Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Noble v. ColwellOhio Supreme Court · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doe v. Beach House Development CompanyOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Kim v. AirstreamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  3. Schiff v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API