Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. Atlas Automobile Finance Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1939No. Appeal, 82PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Cunningham, J.,

The proceeding below was assumpsit by a firm of certified public accountants against the defendant finance corporation to recover $677.50, alleged to be due for professional services.

Plaintiffs’ statement of claim included three sepa rate items, each founded upon an alleged oral contract with defendant—$75 for an examination of defendant’s transactions and a report thereon for the month of June, 1936; $456.25 for a detailed examination to determine the extent of certain embezzlements by a bookkeeper; and $146.25 for selecting and training a new bookkeeper. These…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Philadelphia v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Dougherty v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Armstrong v. Standard Ice Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Bastian v. Marienville Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Beck v. Philadelphia Automobile Trade Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Robert Wooler Co. v. Fidelity BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Social Security Administration Baltimore Federal Credit Union v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
  3. Ilhami Tekman v. Herb BerkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  4. Specker v. Sun Ray Drug Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Calderoni v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API