Legal Opinion

Social Security Administration Baltimore Federal Credit Union v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 26, 1956No. Civ. A. 7191PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

This is an action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act by a Federal credit union to recover losses sustained as the result of embezzlements extending over a period of years by its office manager, Mrs. Naomi Ringrose. An examination and investigation by Federal examiners in March, 1953, disclosed a shortage of approximately $395,000 in members’ share accounts not recorded on the books. Mrs. Ringrose pleaded guilty to an indictment charging her with the embezzlement of approximately $34,000. She testified in the case at bar that her defalcations began…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Fahey v. MalloneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
  3. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BakerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1990
  4. In Re Franklin Nat. Bank Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  5. Harmsen v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API