Armstrong v. Standard Ice Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
The plaintiff has the verdict of a jury on which judgment was entered in an action in assumpsit brought to recover a balance claimed to be due from the defendant for wages under a written agreement for his employment. The defendant complains of the refusal of its motions for binding instructions and for judgment n. o. v. We are required on this appeal to determine whether under the circumstances it was the duty of the court to construe the contract, and if it was, then to interpret the writing.
Leo Armstrong and others sold to the defendant an ice plant and on April 2,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McMillin v. TitusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Tustin v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Oleon v. Rosenbloom & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Lane v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Gillespie v. IsemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Darlington v. General ElectricSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Martin v. Capital Cities Media, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Monongahela Street Railway Co. v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Sterle v. Galiardi Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.