Legal Opinion

Bastian v. Marienville Glass Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1924No. Appeal, 107PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadleb,

Bastian, the plaintiff, is the owner of a hotel property, and, desiring to light it by electricity, caused the building to be wired for that purpose. He entered into negotiations for the necessary supply of current with the Marienville Glass Company, a corporation primarily engaged in the manufacture of bottles. In 1915, it was orally agreed by the parties named that, if the plaintiff furnished an engine, a generator and dynamo would be supplied by defendant, and the plant be operated for their joint use. Dispute as to the terms of this contract gave rise to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Joliet Bottling Co. v. Joliet Citizens' Brewing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Coffin v. LandisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  4. Bellevue Borough v. Ohio Valley Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. ECKINGTON AND SOLDIERS' HOME RAILWAY CO. v. McDEVITTSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Elia v. OlszewskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Clarkson v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. MacHen v. Budd Wheel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Norwood Lumber Corporation v. McKeanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  5. O'Neill v. Atlas Automobile Finance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API