Legal Opinion

United States v. Nancy Mageno

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 19, 2015No. 12-10474PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

In our prior opinion in this case, we vacated Nancy Mageno’s drug conspiracy conviction because of what appeared from the record to be the prosecution’s misstatement of the evidence during closing arguments. See United States v. Mageno, 762 F.3d 933 (9th Cir.2014). The court reporter’s official transcript has since been corrected, and we now know that no misstatements actually occurred. The government has brought these transcript corrections to our attention for the first time in a petition for rehearing, asking us to vacate our prior opinion and affirm Mage-no’s conviction. We hold,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Betty L. Varney v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Sakhawat Ullah, Jr., United States of America v. Mary Katherine Gosho-KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Thomas Zichettello, Frank Richardone, Ronald Reale, Richard Hartman, James J. Lysaght, and Peter KramerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. Morrison v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Citlalli FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Duane EhmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. In re: Ashkan Rajaee and Nassim RajaeeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026
  4. In re: Ashkan Rajaee and Nassim RajaeeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026
  5. In re: Ashkan Rajaee and Nassim RajaeeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API