Legal Opinion

In re: Ashkan Rajaee and Nassim Rajaee

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 10, 2026No. 3:25-cv-03530Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 In re: Case No.: 25-cv-3530-RSH-GC 12 ASHKAN RAJAEE and NASSIM (Appeal from S.D. Cal. Bankr. 13 RAJAEE, Case No. 3:24-bk-00617-CL) Debtors. 14 _________________________________ ORDER (1) GRANTING APPELLEE’S 15 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND ASHKAN RAJAEE, (2) DENYING APPELLANT’S 16 MOTION FOR REHEARING Appellant, 17 v. 18 [ECF Nos. 11, 18] CHRISTOPHER R. BARCLAY, 19 Chapter 7 Trustee, WEINBERG 20 GONSER FROST LLP, and JORDAN MATTHEWS, 21 Appellees. 22 23 Pending before the Court are two motions. Appellee…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Harry Fondiller, Debtor. Rosalyn Fondiller v. Jerome E. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Michael Cohen v. Russell K. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. First Federal Bank of California v. Weinstein (In Re Weinstein)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MassingillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. In Re Chelcey R. Fowler in Re Lynda Fowler, Debtors, United States of America v. Chelcey R. Fowler Lynda FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API