Legal Opinion

In re: Ashkan Rajaee and Nassim Rajaee

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 10, 2026No. 3:25-cv-03506Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 In re: Case No.: 25-cv-3506-RSH-GC 12 ASHKAN RAJAEE and NASSIM (Appeal from S.D. Cal. Bankr. 13 RAJAEE, Case No. 3:24-bk-00617-CL) Debtors. 14 _________________________________ ORDER (1) GRANTING APPELLEE’S 15 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND ASHKAN RAJAEE, (2) DENYING APPELLANT’S 16 MOTION FOR REHEARING Appellant, 17 v. 18 [ECF Nos. 10, 18] CHRISTOPHER R. BARCLAY, 19 Chapter 7 Trustee, TYLER DAVIS, and 20 TOPDEVZ, LLC, 21 Appellees. 22 23 Pending before the Court are two motions. Appellee Christopher R. Barclay 24…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. In the Matter of Harry Fondiller, Debtor. Rosalyn Fondiller v. Jerome E. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. In Re P.R.T.C., Inc., Debtor. Duckor Spradling & Metzger v. Baum TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. First Federal Bank of California v. Weinstein (In Re Weinstein)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. In Re Chelcey R. Fowler in Re Lynda Fowler, Debtors, United States of America v. Chelcey R. Fowler Lynda FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API