Legal Opinion

Blonquist v. Frandsen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1984No. 18958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice.

This is an appeal from a trial court’s decree ordering the partition of a parcel of land held in cotenancy by the parties to this action. Defendant claims that the partition is not just and equitable.

The parcel in question is located in Park City, Utah, and contains approximately eleven acres. The parcel is shaped like a right triangle. The hypotenuse of the triangle borders a freeway. One of the other sides of the triangle lies adjacent to a residential area and the third side of the triangle lies adjacent to a commercially zoned area.

The plaintiffs’ expert testified that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gillmor v. GillmorUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Condas v. CondasUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Arthur v. ChournosUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In re Ferguson's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United Park City Mines Co. v. Stichting Mayflower Mountain FondsUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Massey v. HrostekSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. Frame v. FrameMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Kent v. KentNevada Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API