Legal Opinion

United Park City Mines Co. v. Stichting Mayflower Mountain Fonds

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2006No. 20040943PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Justice:

¶ 1 This case stems from the application of a much-favored property right: a cotenant’s right to partition. Partition is intended to broker peace between feuding cotenants and promote the productive use of property. The scarcity of relevant case law is perhaps a reflection of the effectiveness and wisdom of the remedy. Nevertheless, a judicial parti tion can sometimes breed further contention and dissatisfaction. This is one such case.

¶ 2 Appellants Stichting Mayflower Mountain Fonds and Stichting Mayflower Recreational Fonds (collectively, “Mayflower”) challenge the trial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Soter's, Inc. v. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Pledger v. GillespieUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. RHN CORP. v. VeibellUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re Estate of FlakeUtah Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Martinez v. Media-Paymaster Plus/Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Brown v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Hoyer v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Kenny v. RichCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API