United Park City Mines Co. v. Stichting Mayflower Mountain Fonds
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PARRISH, Justice:
¶ 1 This case stems from the application of a much-favored property right: a cotenant’s right to partition. Partition is intended to broker peace between feuding cotenants and promote the productive use of property. The scarcity of relevant case law is perhaps a reflection of the effectiveness and wisdom of the remedy. Nevertheless, a judicial parti tion can sometimes breed further contention and dissatisfaction. This is one such case.
¶ 2 Appellants Stichting Mayflower Mountain Fonds and Stichting Mayflower Recreational Fonds (collectively, “Mayflower”) challenge the trial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Soter's, Inc. v. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Pledger v. GillespieUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- RHN CORP. v. VeibellUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Estate of FlakeUtah Supreme Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- Martinez v. Media-Paymaster Plus/Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Brown v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Hoyer v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Kenny v. RichCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.