Legal Opinion

Frame v. Frame

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1987No. 86-578PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Appellants David Frame and Mullan properties appeal an order of the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, granting an injunction to respondents Hugh Frame and American Asphalt, Inc. pending suit on their action for partition of real property owned by Mullan Properties.

The single issue raised on appeal is whether the District Court erred in granting an injunction prohibiting termination of respondent’s lease pending partition of Mullan Properties’ real property.

Plaintiffs/respondents Hugh W. Frame (Hugh) and American Asphalt, Inc. are involved in a sand and gravel and asphalt paving…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. De Mik v. CargillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  2. Chesmore v. ChesmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Jeppeson v. State, Dept. of State LandsMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Davis v. BurtonMontana Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Smith v. Ravalli County Board of HealthMontana Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Butler v. GermannMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. M.H. Ex Rel. M.H. v. Montana High School Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. J.M. v. Montana High School Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Karen Wynkoop v. Gerard StratthausSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  5. Flood v. KalinyaprakMontana Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API