Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Chournos

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1978No. 15031PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Defendants, hereinafter referred to as “Chournos,” appeal from an order partitioning 5,238 acres of range land located in Box Elder County upon the Promontory Peninsula which is bounded on three sides by the waters of the Great Salt Lake. The land is owned by Chournos and plaintiffs, hereinafter referred to as “Arthur,” in equal, undivided interests and has been utilized for the grazing of livestock in the months of winter and spring. Both parties own other land in the same area in their own right. Arthur leases his interests to tenants while Chournos utilizes all of his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stanley v. StanleyUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. First Security Bank of Utah N. A. v. DemirisUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Stone v. StoneUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Barrett v. VickersUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State Tax Commission v. CrandallUtah Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gillmor v. GillmorUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Blonquist v. FrandsenUtah Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API