Legal Opinion
Suryan v. Alaska Industrial Board
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided January 23, 1950No. 6198-APublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
This is a proceed'.ng under Section 43-3-22, A.C.L.A. 1949, to set aside a decision of the Alaska Industrial Board reversing its earlier decision that it had no jurisdiction, and awarding compensation to Lindekrantz.
Lindekrantz was injured on July 12, 1948, while engaged as a fisherman on navigable waters of the United States. Concluding that the action fell within the admiralty jurisdiction, the Board, on November 30, denied Lindekrantz’s claim, but upon the rehearing, granted on his petition of December 26, 1948, the Board, on September 28, 1949, reversed itself and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Olive Proration Program Committee v. Agricultural Prorate CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- South v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- People Ex Rel. Chase v. . WempleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Heap v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Anchor Casualty Co. v. BONGARDS CO-OPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSN.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Armijo v. Save 'N GainNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Hodges v. Alaska Constructors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Aronson v. Brookline Rent Control BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Career Service Review Board v. Utah Department of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.