Legal Opinion

Armijo v. Save 'N Gain

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1989No. 10558PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, Judge.

Claimant, Yvette Armijo, appeals the denial of her motion seeking to reopen her worker’s compensation claim for psychological disability in order to permit a formal hearing on the merits. The principal issue raised by claimant on appeal is whether the Workers’ Compensation Division (WCD) hearing officer abused his discretion by refusing to allow claimant to reject the recommended resolution made by the prehearing officer after she had filed a written acceptance of the proposed administrative resolution. We affirm.

Claimant was employed by Save ’N Gain in Albuquerque as a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. State v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. GuerraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Wammack v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wilson v. DenverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Chavez v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. St. Clair v. County of GrantNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Career Service Review Board v. Utah Department of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Tapia v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API