Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Aronson v. Brookline Rent Control Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 24, 1985PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

We hold, affirming a judgment of the Superior Court, that the Brookline rent control board (board) may reopen its adjudicatory proceedings, which had resulted in decisions permitting the plaintiff Aronson to sell his housing units as condominiums, in order to determine whether he procured those decisions by misrepresentation or fraud.

By force of a by-law of the town of Brookline, authorized by St. 1970, c. 843, 2 the board is empowered to regulate the removal of housing units from rental housing use for the purpose of condominium conversion. The effect of the provisions of town by-law 38 (see…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Civil Aeronautics Board v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Frisco Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. East Chop Tennis Club v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Skulski v. NolanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sahin v. SahinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. Conservation Commission v. PachecoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  3. Stowe v. BolognaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  4. Reilly v. Local 589, Amalgamated Transit UnionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  5. Soe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API